Wednesday, April 13, 2005

More whining about pitting motherfuckers in the pit...

From the submission thread:

Mhendo writes a very solid OP refuting some of the bullshit rhetoric made against Bush protestors during the RNC convention (which exposes not only that more 90% of those arrested were innocent but that the pigs and the DA were caught lying through their teeth and tampering with evidence) and in the course of the OP Mhendo takes a few potshots at Shodan (who pretty much deserved it) and suddenly, instead of addressing the substance of the OP we get morons like Cheesedick and Unclefucker crying and bitching because the OP insulted Shodan (who deserved it) in a fucking PIT THREAD.

What the fuck, man? Do we have to justify insulting Shodan in pit threads now? What the fuck for? Shodan pretty much specializes in sweeping insults of liberals so the crying is that much more unjustified.

Even if it's gratuitous and off topic (and in this case it was neither) so fucking what? If I want to bitch about my job and then say "oh, by the way, Dio is a cunt" am I not allowed to do that?

Fucking crybabies, man.

15 Comments:

At 4/13/2005 1:44 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
Hi, Dio.  
At 4/13/2005 1:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
It's the kinder, gentler pit. Bring your kids!

Oh, and since this is an anon forum, fuck.  
At 4/13/2005 2:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
I'll kill. I'll kill. You filthy, rotten, dirty fool. If you want to live you better shut up.  
At 4/13/2005 2:31 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
I do believe that Shodan is an anagram for Mhendo. Or is it the other way around?  
At 4/13/2005 3:22 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
Mhendo proved himself to be just another Fundamentalist Democrat with his first sentence. Fuck him and all his persecution-whore complex ilk, like Dio, Elucidator, Rjung, RTF, etc. etc.  
At 4/13/2005 3:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
Heh, just read through until Unclebeer came in. Fuck the bonehead that brought this in (I'm betting it was Mockingbird... he was in his typical Shoot-Mouth-Off-Hope-Fellow-Cronies-Cover-For-Me-Later style). Mhendo took a six-month old thread, at a time when the evidence that he so roundly criticizes Shodan for not having was available, and pulls the whole "I'm not pitting him but I'll call him a stupid Repugnican anyway" bullshit.

Bunch of liberal wank, is what it is.  
At 4/13/2005 4:13 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
Evidence was beside the point. Shodie accused liberals of being "more willing to commit crimes" on the basis of arrest numbers only. Arrests don't mean fuck and the pigs are always more eager to fuck with hippies than with Bible bangers anyway. So even withou all the facts Shodan was still full of bullshit.

Also, Bush is a cunt and anyone who vote for Bush is a cunt.  
At 4/13/2005 4:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
It's. The. Pit. Jesus fucking Christ on a bike people, it isnt great debates. Why do we now have to be nice in a place specifically for flaming? If your precious little sensitivities are offended, stay the fuck out.
"Oooh, it's a pile on, you're mean!" Grow up.  
At 4/13/2005 6:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
Shodie accused liberals of being "more willing to commit crimes" on the basis of arrest numbers only.

On the basis of THE ONLY AVAILABLE EVIDENCE at the time, douchenipple. Which is also beside the point... Mhendo clearly intended his little post to be a "Repugs are t3h baddies!" writ of liberal wank material. It got labeled appropriately.  
At 4/13/2005 6:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
Don't you know that "don't be a jerk" is the one true rule of the SDMB? That's right, you're not allowed to be a jerk there. Start being a jerk and you'll be banned instantly. Yessirree.  
At 4/13/2005 7:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
Theres so much political namecalling going on anymore I just can't fucking keep it straight. And I don't dare try to ask who the bad guy is today. Jesus Christ, what a shitstorm that would be.

I can hardly care about the substance behind the arguements when all I get from it is a mental image of republican pug dogs in suit and tie, playing poker with democratic cats dressed like J. Edgar Hoover on his way to the Rocky Horror Picture Show. All I can say is- at least the democrats seem to know how to maintain their dignity whilst licking their bungholes.

Thank you.  
At 4/13/2005 7:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
I can't imagine being on the side of Diogenes so anyone on the other side I tend to respect. Unclebeer and Shodan? Ehhh. No biggie. All that thread is is a bunch of lefties trying to tell us the sky isn't blue. Same old same old.  
At 4/13/2005 8:34 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
The main problem is that a bunch of noclass ninnies who have no idea how to wage a rage war against the oppressive thoughts of those who do not think like we do propogating their mindless thought processes in the digital forum of a soapbox that nobody is reading, at least not with any comprehension, negating any positive influence they may have had concerning a political reaction to a emotional, yet easily discernable, causitive reflection of the mirror image of the abstract of an idealist utopia wherin universalists might prognosticate their own prediliction towards presdidigitation in the very real and concrete paradigm of intellectual solipism which threatens to overcome any rationality or tendency to equate opinions, whether of religiosity or not, on a population which neither knows nor cares if any side is actually supposed to represent the soligisms endemic to the prosylatisation of cogent thought as opposed to the individual's own nedd to surrender their inalienable desires to profess some sort of rational belief system regardless of the causation thereof.

Fuckers.  
At 4/13/2005 8:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
Fuck.





Makes perfect sense stated that way.  
At 4/14/2005 6:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
What the fattie said. Yeah!  

<< Home