Thursday, April 14, 2005

Reeder literally sickens me. Oops. Got some vomit on my chickpea salad. :(

From the submission thread:

Joe Doper asks whether it's legal to use someone's unsecured wireless connection. Reeder say's it's not legal because he doesn't like it. Then he says it 8 more times. Knowing this guy is a fat disgusting FREAK just makes his horrible stupidity even more disgusting. What a fucking annoying pig.

posted by secretdubai @ 12:15 AM   14 tokes off a turd

14 Comments:

At 4/14/2005 6:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
Every time he starts saying something stupid, I just imagine some big hulk of a guy bitch-slapping him and shoving his cock into his whiney little mouth. It makes me feel better about myself.  
At 4/14/2005 6:24 AM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
To this day I still can't get that damn other thread out of my head. I hated the guy before because, well let's face it, he's a troll. A troll who goes untouched, but only untouched because they agree with what he says. At least with Lynn, and that's all that really matters.

So he was bad enough before, but that damn thread. If I could ever go back and rearrange something, it'd be opening that thread. Because since then, I haven't been able to look at him, and the place, the same. It's just so... THAT. That that's wrong.  
At 4/14/2005 8:44 AM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
"....I really wish I had never followed those links. That was some nasty shit."

What links? What are you guys talking about?  
At 4/14/2005 9:55 AM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
Are you high? His only link is to his Yahoo screenname. It takes some finagling to go from there to his profile, which includes logging into yahoo with your own account and agreeing to view adult profiles. It comes nowhere CLOSE to violating the one click rule.  
At 4/14/2005 11:08 AM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
I think anon was just using a little hyperbole there. ALthough I really wish I had never clicked on that.  
At 4/14/2005 11:16 AM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
"What links? What are you guys talking about?"

Just imagine some old chubby ho-bag with bug eyes and a double chin and an old sailor-type guy with big glasses and a bushy moustache. Now just imagine they were sharing some corn on the cob by trying to both eat it at the same time.

Well, it wasn't corn...  
At 4/14/2005 11:38 AM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
What a cock he is. It's a GQ about the legality of a certain act. Answer yes, no or it depends and then cite your source. If you want a discussion of morals we have GD or the Pit  
At 4/14/2005 12:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
"Well, it wasn't corn..."

So he was cockbiting?  
At 4/14/2005 5:49 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
So he was cockbiting?

Ding ding ding ding, we have a winnah!

And normally I would just say, to each his own, but after seeing Reeder and his babe I really wanted to bleach my eyeballs. Ugh.  
At 4/14/2005 8:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
But... but didn't you wonder... who was holding the camera?  
At 4/15/2005 10:13 AM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
It was Brutus.


What, you thought all that bickering between those two was about politics?  
At 4/15/2005 5:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
That wasn't Reeder and his "slut" sharing the dick. That was a picture posted by other members of his community.
How do I know this? Because I signed up to the community out of curiosity. The only picture of Reeder, was the topless one on his profile page.  
At 4/15/2005 8:54 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
That's what we were talking about.  
At 4/16/2005 5:17 PM, Anonymous Anonymous snarked:
QUOTE: But... but didn't you wonder... who was holding the camera?

SCOTT EVIL [obig. caps.]  

<< Home